Quenisha Gardner v. State of TexasAppeal from 114th District Court of Smith County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-13-00018-CR QUENISHA GARDNER, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 114th District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 003-0149-09 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley MEMORANDUM OPINION Quenisha Gardner appeals a judgment adjudicating guilt for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02 (West 2011). Gardner was sentenced to five years incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division. Gardner was represented by different appointed counsel at trial and on appeal. 1 Gardner s attorney on appeal has filed a brief which discusses the record and reviews the proceedings in detail. The brief sets out the procedural history and summarizes the evidence elicited during the course of the proceeding. Meeting the requirements of Anders v. California, counsel has provided a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 743 44 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel mailed a copy of the brief to Gardner on April 22, 2013, informing her of her right to file a pro se response and of her right to review the record. Counsel has also filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal. Gardner has neither filed a pro se response, nor has she requested an extension of time in which to file such a response. 1 Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 2 We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the clerk s record and the reporter s record, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). In a frivolous appeal situation, we are to determine whether the appeal is without merit and frivolous, and, if so, the appeal must be dismissed or affirmed. 2 See Anders, 386 U.S. 738. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. 3 Bailey C. Moseley Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: July 1, 2013 July 2, 2013 Do Not Publish 2 We note that the clerk s record includes an order to withdraw funds from Gardner s trust account to include costs, fees and/or fines and/or restitution incurred in the amount of $284.00. We further note that the judgment does not reflect an order for payment of court costs, fees, fines, or restitution. 3 Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case. Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, appellant must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or appellant must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from either the date of this opinion or the date on which the last timely motion for rehearing or for en banc reconsideration was overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
