Jamie Lee Coker v. The State of TexasAppeal from 188th District Court of Gregg County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-12-00086-CR JAMIE LEE COKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 32984-A Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley MEMORANDUM OPINION Jamie Lee Coker appeals from his conviction of intoxication assault and sentence of ten years imprisonment. Coker has filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals. 1 He argues that: (1) the waiver of his right to a jury trial and the stipulations of evidence entered by him were involuntary, (2) the trial court erred in failing to reinstate the right to a jury trial and in allowing the use of his stipulations of evidence, and (3) the trial court erred in admitting various State s exhibits over objections to their admissibility, including hearsay, violations of the Confrontation Clause and Fifth Amendment rights, and Texas Code of Criminal Appeals Article 33.22 objections. We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Coker s appeal in cause number 06-12-00084-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we, likewise, conclude that error has not been shown in this case. We affirm the trial court s judgment. Bailey C. Moseley Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: June 18, 2013 June 19, 2013 Do Not Publish 1 Coker also appeals two convictions of intoxication manslaughter, one resulting in a sentence of twenty years imprisonment in our cause number 06-12-00084-CR, the other resulting in thirty years imprisonment in our cause number 06-12-00085-CR, and two other separate convictions for intoxication assault, each resulting in sentences of ten years imprisonment in our cause numbers 06-12-00087-CR and 06-12-00088-CR. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
