Marion Thomas West, Individually and d/b/a Royle Container Company v. Brenntag Southwest, Inc., Successor In Interest to Delta Solvents and Chemical Company formerly d/b/a Delta Container--Appeal from County Court at Law of Gregg County
Annotate this CaseIn The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-03-00149-CV
______________________________
MARION THOMAS WEST, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A
ROYLE CONTAINER COMPANY, Appellants
V.
BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST, INC., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO
DELTA SOLVENTS AND CHEMICAL COMPANY,
FORMERLY D/B/A DELTA CONTAINER, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Gregg County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2002-90-CCL2
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Marion Thomas West, Individually and d/b/a Royle Container Company has filed a purported appeal. He filed a docketing statement with this Court reflecting that a jury had reached a verdict and that he filed his notice of appeal November 7, 2003. He has requested preparation of the clerk's and reporter's records, neither of which has been filed. This is likely because the trial court has signed no judgment in this case.
On April 2, 2004, over five months after West filed his notice of appeal, we recognized no record had been filed and no action apparently taken to obtain it. We then contacted counsel by letter, specifically pointing out that, as of that date, no judgment had been signed from which he could appeal and warning him that, if he did not take sufficient action to show this Court the appeal was proceeding properly, it would be subject to dismissal.
As of this date, no judgment has been signed in this case. Appellate timetables are calculated from the date the judgment is signed. As there is no judgment in existence from which an appeal may be pursued, we dismiss this appeal, without prejudice to an appeal being taken after a judgment is signed.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: May 10, 2004
Date Decided: May 11, 2004
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.