Larry Everette White v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 196th District Court of Hunt County

Annotate this Case

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

______________________________

 

No. 06-03-00175-CR

______________________________

 

LARRY EVERETT WHITE, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21,451

 

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

On June 6, 2003, Larry Everett White, Jr., waived his right to a jury trial and pled guilty with no plea agreement to five felony charges pending in Hunt County, Texas. This appeal concerns only White's conviction for retaliation in trial court cause number 21,451. // The indictment further alleged White had been previously, finally, and sequentially convicted of two additional felony offenses. After the trial court admonished White about the enhanced punishment range applicable in this case (twenty-five to ninety-nine years, or life), White pled "true" to enhancement allegations. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report. On July 24, 2003, the trial court sentenced White to fifty years' imprisonment. White timely appealed his conviction and sentence to this Court.

White appealed each of his five convictions separately, but the briefs in four of the cases are substantively identical: White's counsel has reviewed the record and determined there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised; he asks that we allow him to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Since the briefs and arguments raised therein are identical in each appeal, for the reasons stated in White v. State, No. 06-03-00173-CR, we likewise affirm the trial court's judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted: March 2, 2004

Date Decided: March 18, 2004

 

Do Not Publish

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.