Larry Everette White v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 196th District Court of Hunt County
Annotate this CaseIn The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-03-00177-CR
______________________________
LARRY EVERETT WHITE, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court
Hunt County, Texas
Trial Court No. 21,453
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 6, 2003, Larry Everett White, Jr., waived his right to a jury trial and pled guilty to five felony charges pending in Hunt County, Texas. This appeal concerns only White's conviction for aggravated robbery in trial court cause number 21,453. // The indictment further alleged White had been previously, finally, and sequentially convicted of two additional felony offenses. After the trial court admonished White about the enhanced punishment range applicable in this case (twenty-five to ninety-nine years, or life), White pled "true" to enhancement allegations. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report. On July 24, 2003, the trial court sentenced White to fifty years' imprisonment. (There was not a negotiated plea agreement in this case.) White timely appealed his conviction and sentence to this Court.
White appealed each of his five convictions separately, but the briefs in four of the cases are substantively identical: White's counsel has reviewed the record and determined there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised; he asks that we allow him to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Since the briefs and arguments raised therein are identical in each appeal, for the reasons stated in White v. State, No. 06-03-00173-CR, we likewise affirm the trial court's judgment.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: March 2, 2004
Date Decided: March 18, 2004
Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.