James Paul Noble v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 115th District Court of Upshur County
Annotate this CaseIn The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-04-00032-CR
______________________________
JAMES PAUL NOBLE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court
Upshur County, Texas
Trial Court No. 13,190
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
James Paul Noble has filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for murder. A jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at thirty-five years' imprisonment. The court imposed sentence April 24, 2003. No motion for new trial was filed.
Noble filed a notice of appeal over six months later, on January 30, 2004. Appellate jurisdiction is invoked by giving timely and proper notice of appeal. White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 428 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Where no motion for new trial is filed, a defendant must file his notice of appeal within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). The right to appeal is conferred by the Legislature. See Rushing v. State, 85 S.W.3d 283, 286 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). A party may appeal only that which the Legislature has authorized. See Marin v. State, 851 S.W.2d 275, 278 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure do not establish the jurisdiction of the appellate courts, but instead set out procedures which must be followed in order to invoke that jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Without a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Id. at 522. If the jurisdiction of a court of appeals is not properly invoked, the power of the court to act is as absent as if it did not exist. Ex parte Caldwell, 383 S.W.2d 587, 589 (Tex. Crim. App. 1964) (op. on reh'g). The notice of appeal is untimely.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: March 2, 2004
Date Decided: March 3, 2004
Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.