T.C. Anderson v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 196th District Court of Hunt County

In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-02-00172-CR
______________________________
T. C. ANDERSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court
Hunt County, Texas
Trial Court No. 21,063
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION

T. C. Anderson appeals from his conviction for sexual assault on a child younger than fourteen years of age. In this cause, Anderson appeals his convictions on two counts of indecency with a child by sexual contact and thirteen counts of aggravated sexual assault on a child younger than fourteen years of age. (1) A jury found Anderson guilty on all counts and assessed punishment at life imprisonment. In a companion appeal, cause number 06-02-00171-CR, Anderson appeals his conviction of an additional fourteen counts of sexual assault on a child younger than seventeen years of age. (2)

Anderson contends that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of guilt on each of the separate counts, that he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel, and that the trial court erred by failing to disqualify his trial counsel when he discovered midtrial that his wife had some contact with the victim.

In the companion appeal, we addressed each of these contentions of error. A factual distinction between the appeals is that the present appeal covers offenses allegedly committed during a different two-year time period from that alleged in the companion case. As we set out in that opinion, however, there is evidence Anderson sexually assault the victim virtually every other day for that entire time. Thus, there is no legal distinction to be drawn, as the evidence supports the jury's findings for the entirety of the four-year time period.

Although not argued by counsel, we also recognize there is testimony by the victim fully supporting the jury's verdict in connection with the two sexual contact counts in the present case.

Accordingly, as the legal arguments are identical in both appeals, for the reasons stated in cause number 06-02-00171-CR, we likewise find no error in the present appeal and affirm for the reasons stated in that opinion.

We affirm the judgment.

 

Jack Carter

Justice

 

Date Submitted: September 26, 2003

Date Decided: September 30, 2003

 

Do Not Publish

1. The present appeal is from the convictions on the indictment for the dates between May 17, 1994 and September 17, 1996.

2. The companion appeal is from the convictions on the indictment for the dates between October 17, 1996 and September 17, 1998.