Jacob Aaron Vera v. The State of Texas Appeal from 100th District Court of Hall County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-23-00415-CR No. 07-23-00416-CR JACOB AARON VERA, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 100th District Court Hall County, Texas Trial Court No. 4144, 4145, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding November 21, 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN. C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Jacob Aaron Vera, appeals from the trial court’s judgments adjudicating him guilty of two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child1 and sentencing him to forty years’ confinement for each count, to be served consecutively. We dismiss the untimely appeals for want of jurisdiction. 1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021. Appellant was sentenced on September 18, 2023. Because no motion for new trial was filed, a notice of appeal was due within thirty days after sentence was imposed, i.e., by October 18, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (requiring a notice of appeal to be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed or within ninety days if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial). Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 31, 2023, within the fifteen-day extension period, but did not file a motion for extension until November 6, after the fifteen-day extension period expired. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 (permitting an appellate court to extend the time to file a notice of appeal if a notice and a motion for extension are filed within fifteen days of the notice of appeal deadline). Appellant’s motion for extension explained that his late notice of appeal was due to a delay in the appointment of counsel. The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). Although appellate courts may extend the time to file a notice by fifteen days pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, when a notice of appeal but no motion for extension of time is filed within the fifteen-day extension period, an appellate court lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (en banc); Lair v. State, 321 S.W.3d 158, 159 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d) (explaining that in criminal appeals, no motion for extension is implied when a notice of appeal is filed within fifteen days of the deadline). Because Appellant did not file his motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period provided by appellate rule 26.3, we must deny 2 the requested extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Appellant’s notice of appeal is, therefore, untimely. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.2 Per Curiam Do not publish. 2 Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
