Stephen Patrick Black v. Amy Curtis Appeal from County Court of Lamb County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-23-00261-CV STEPHEN PATRICK BLACK, APPELLANT V. AMY CURTIS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court Lamb County, Texas Trial Court No. CC-3442, Honorable James M. DeLoach, Presiding August 9, 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Stephen Patrick Black, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment order in favor of Appellee, Amy Curtis. The trial court signed the summary judgment order on April 10, 2023. On June 27, 2023, Black filed a notice of appeal and a sworn motion to extend the appellate deadline pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 306a. In his Rule 306a motion, Black asserts that he did not receive notice or acquire actual knowledge of the order until June 15, 2023, when he received a certified mailing from the trial court clerk. The Rule 306a motion remains pending in the trial court. We remand the cause to the trial court to rule on the motion pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 4.2(c). A timely notice of appeal is essential to invoking our jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616–17 (Tex. 1997). To be timely, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is signed or within ninety days if a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). However, if a party does not receive notice or acquire actual knowledge of a judgment within twenty days of its signing, the period to file a notice of appeal will not begin to run until the date the party received notice or acquired actual knowledge of the judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(a); TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a.4. To gain this additional time, a party must file a sworn Rule 306a motion and obtain a written order that finds the date when the party or the party’s attorney first received notice or acquired actual knowledge that the judgment was signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(b), (c); TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a.5. Black filed a sworn Rule 306a motion with the trial court seeking additional time to file his notice of appeal and requesting a hearing. “The sworn motion establishes a prima facie case that the party lacked timely notice and invokes a trial court’s otherwise-expired jurisdiction for the limited purpose of holding an evidentiary hearing to determine the date on which the party or its counsel first received notice or acquired knowledge of the judgment.” In re Lynd Co., 195 S.W.3d 682, 685 (Tex. 2006). We, therefore, abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to conduct a hearing, rule on Black’s motion, and enter a finding of the date Black received notice or acquired actual knowledge of the signing of the summary judgment order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2; TEX. R. CIV. 2 P.306a; PDG, Inc. v. Abilene Vill., LLC, No. 07-19-00118-CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 3129, at *3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Apr. 17, 2019, order) (per curiam) (remanding for the trial court to enter findings in accordance with appellate rule 4.2). The trial court shall enter its findings in a written order and include the order in a clerk’s record to be filed with this Court by September 8, 2023. It is so ordered. Per Curiam 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
