Bol Marko Deng v. The State of Texas Appeal from 108th District Court of Potter County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-23-00099-CR No. 07-23-00100-CR No. 07-23-00101-CR BOL MARKO DENG, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 83111-E-CR, 83386-E-CR, 83387-E-CR, Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding April 28, 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Bol Marko Deng, is under indictment for murder1 and two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.2 On March 20, 2023, Appellant filed a notice 1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(c). 2 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2). of appeal, pro se, seeking to appeal the trial court’s purported orders setting bail. We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction in a criminal case to consider an appeal from a judgment of guilt or where jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697–98 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). An order setting bail is neither a judgment of guilt nor an appealable order. See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (“There is no constitutional or statutory authority granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail or the denial of bail.”); McCarver v. State, 257 S.W.3d 512, 515 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, no pet.) (concluding that there is no “direct appeal from interlocutory pretrial orders involving bail”). By letter of March 22, 2023, we directed Appellant to show how we have jurisdiction over this appeal by April 3. Appellant has not filed a response or had any further communication with this Court to date. Because Appellant has not presented this Court with a judgment or appealable order, we dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction. Per Curiam Do not publish. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.