Midcoast G&P (Oklahoma) L.P., Midcoast Pipelines (Texas Gathering) L.P., and Midcoast Pipelines (Texas Liquids) L.P. v. Hemphill County Appraisal District Appeal from 31st District Court of Hemphill County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-22-00258-CV MIDCOAST G&P (OKLAHOMA) L.P., MIDCOAST PIPELINES (TEXAS GATHERING) L.P., AND MIDCOAST PIPELINES (TEXAS LIQUIDS) L.P., APPELLANTS V. HEMPHILL COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 31st District Court Hemphill County, Texas Trial Court No. 7551, Honorable Steven R. Emmert, Presiding October 18, 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellants, Midcoast G&P (Oklahoma) L.P., Midcoast Pipelines (Texas Gathering) L.P., and Midcoast Pipelines (Texas Liquids) L.P., appeal from the trial court’s final judgment. Now pending before this Court is the parties’ joint motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of an agreed judgment. The motion is signed by counsel for all parties. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B), we grant the motion, reverse the trial court’s judgment without passing on the merits of the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties. In accordance with the joint motion, costs shall be taxed against the parties that incurred them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having reversed the trial court’s judgment at the request of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
