In the Interest of S.N.R.T., a Child Appeal from 99th District Court of Lubbock County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-20-00344-CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.N.R.T., A CHILD On Appeal from the 99th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-509,462, Honorable William C. Sowder, Presiding January 5, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellant, Cindy Renea Bell, appeals from the trial court’s Order in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship. We dismiss the appeal because Bell has not paid the filing fee and for want of jurisdiction. Bell failed to pay the required filing fee upon filing her notice of appeal. By letter of December 7, 2020, the Clerk of this Court notified Bell that unless she was excused from paying court costs under Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1, failure to pay the filing fee by December 17 would result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, Bell has not paid the filing fee or sought leave to proceed without payment of court costs. Because she failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules and a notice from the Clerk requiring action within a specified time, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Furthermore, Bell filed her notice of appeal untimely. The trial court signed the Order in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship on August 11, 2020. Bell timely filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law and a motion for new trial. Accordingly, her notice of appeal was due within ninety days after the order was signed, i.e. by November 9, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). She filed a notice of appeal on December 4, 2020. A timely notice of appeal is essential to invoking this Court’s jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616-17 (Tex. 1997). By letter of December 8, 2020, we notified Bell that her notice of appeal appeared untimely and directed her to file a response by December 18 showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Bell has not filed a response to date. Accordingly, we dismiss her appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed. Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
