Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon v. The State of Texas Appeal from 320th District Court of Potter County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-19-00189-CR ________________________ JON SANTOS DELGADO-GORDON, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 73,211-D; Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon, Presiding June 13, 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. Appellant, Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon, attempts to appeal the trial court’s order dismissing his post-conviction motion for discovery for want of jurisdiction. We likewise dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction. In 2017, pursuant to an open plea of guilty, Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to sixty-five years confinement.1 Appellant did not appeal his conviction. In January of 2019, Appellant filed a Motion of Discovery pursuant to article 39.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking all documents and items in the State’s possession concerning his criminal case. The trial court signed an order dismissing the motion for want of jurisdiction and Appellant appealed the order. Generally, we have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only from a final judgment of conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2018); Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). We do not have jurisdiction to review a trial court’s orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by statute. Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). See also TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) (providing that a criminal defendant has the right to appeal a judgment of guilt or other appealable order). The trial court’s order dismissing Appellant’s motion for discovery pursuant to article 39.14 is neither a judgment of conviction nor an order appealable by statute. See Bibbs v. State, No. 02-18-00391-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 9192, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Nov. 8, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal from trial court’s denial of article 39.14 motion for discovery for want of jurisdiction). Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction to review the order. 1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b)(3) (West 2019). 2 Because Appellant has failed to properly invoke the jurisdiction of this court, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.2 Per Curiam Do not publish. 2 Appellant may be entitled to relief, however, by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal from his criminal conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
