Brandy Nicole Lopez v. The State of Texas Appeal from 144th District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00038-CR BRANDY NICOLE LOPEZ, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 144th District Court1 Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR8035, Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Presiding June 14, 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ. Appellant, Brandy Nicole Lopez, appeals the trial court’s judgment revoking her deferred adjudication community supervision, adjudicating her guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance,2 and sentencing her to two years’ confinement. Appellant’s brief was originally due February 28, 2019, but was not filed. On March 27, 1 By order of the Texas Supreme Court, this appeal was transferred to this Court from the Fourth Court of Appeals. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). 2 TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(c) (West 2017) (third-degree felony). 2019, we abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court to determine, among other things, whether appellant still desired to prosecute the appeal and why a timely appellate brief had not been filed on behalf of appellant. The trial court held a hearing on May 28, 2019. Both appellant and her counsel were present. At the hearing, appellant notified the trial court that she no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law providing same. Because appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal, we invoke Appellate Rule 2 to suspend operation of Appellate Rule 42.2(a), which requires that appellant and her attorney sign a motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 42.2(a). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam Do not publish. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.