Brittany Barnett d/b/a B-N-B Bail Bonds v. The State of Texas Appeal from 287th District Court of Bailey County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00323-CV BRITTANY BARNETT D/B/A B-N-B BAIL BONDS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 287th District Court Bailey County, Texas Trial Court No. 9708, Honorable Gordon Houston Green, Presiding November 13, 2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Brittany Barnett d/b/a B-N-B Bail Bonds filed a notice of appeal on September 8, 2017. The clerk’s record was due on October 5. However, on September 27, the district clerk notified the Court that Barnett had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). By letter of September 28, we directed Barnett to make acceptable payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, or, if she could not afford to pay for the record, to file a statement of inability to afford payment of court costs in the trial court in accordance with Rule 145 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to do so by October 9, we admonished, would subject the appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). To date, Barnett has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record or filed any response to the Court’s letter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and Barnett’s failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules and an order of the Court. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
