Alex Baldomino v. The State of Texas Appeal from 364th District Court of Lubbock County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00195-CR ALEX BALDOMINO, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 364th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2004-405,890, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding June 16, 2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Alex Baldomino attempts a second appeal from his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We affirmed his conviction in Baldomino v. State, No. 07-05-00286-CR, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 8071 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Sept. 11, 2006, pet. refused) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We dismiss his purported appeal for want of jurisdiction. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). A timely notice of appeal is required to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If the notice is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Id. at 523. On May 30, 2017, appellant filed a “Notice of Appeal under New Retroactive Ruling” in the trial court, over a decade after his conviction and sentencing. Through the document, appellant seeks to set aside his conviction by contending that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial. As his notice of appeal is untimely, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and may take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523. To the extent that appellant’s effort can be viewed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, we note that his conviction was for a felony. We lack authority to issue a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus and thereby vacate that conviction. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (“It is well established that only the Court of Criminal Appeals possesses the authority to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction.”); Ex parte Castillo, No. 07-11-00096-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2188, at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Mar. 25, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“We have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Per Curiam Do not publish. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
