David Gonzalez v. Madison Park Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Lubbock County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-16-00305-CV DAVID GONZALEZ, APPELLANT V. MADISON PARK, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-572,119; Honorable Judy C. Parker, Presiding May 19, 2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. After receiving two extensions, appellant, David Gonzalez, proceeding pro se, filed his appellate brief with this court on January 11, 2017. On January 12, this court sent notice to Gonzalez that his brief does not include the contents required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 and further notifying him that his noncompliant brief would be submitted for consideration if he failed to file a corrected brief by January 27. To date, Gonzalez has not filed any further correspondence with this Court. Review of Gonzalez’s brief reveals that he failed to comply with nearly all of the requirements of Rule 38.1.1 Gonzalez failed to cite authority or provide argument supporting his claims for relief resulting in waiver of his claims due to inadequate briefing. Loudder v. Crop Quest, Inc., No. 07-13-00185-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 7368, at *13-14 (Tex. App.—Amarillo July 8, 2014, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (citing Harris v. Archer, 134 S.W.3d 411, 447 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2004, pet. denied) (mem. op.)). As such, we dismiss Appellant’s appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(a), (f). Per Curiam 1 Beyond the dispositive issue discussed below, Gonzalez’s brief fails to identify the parties and their counsel, TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(a); include a statement of the case, TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(d); identify issues presented, TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(f); include a statement of facts, TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g); include any citations to the record, TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(i); include a prayer that clearly states the nature of the relief sought, TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(j); and include necessary documents, such as the trial court’s judgment or other appealable order from which relief is sought, in an appendix. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(k). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
