RR Royal Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation, and All Other Occupants v. SAPH, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Parker County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-16-00035-CV RR ROYAL RANCH COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 4802 MINERAL WELLS HIGHWAY, WEATHERFORD, TEXAS 76088, APPELLANT V. SAPH, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CA-15-016, Honorable Jerry Buckner, Presiding April 21, 2016 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant RR Royal Ranch Company, a Texas corporation, and all other occupants of 4802 Mineral Wells Highway, Weatherford, Texas 76088, filed a notice of appeal on December 8, 2015. On February 10, 2016, the district clerk notified us by letter that RR Royal Ranch had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). By letter of February 26, we directed RR Royal Ranch to make payment arrangements acceptable to the district clerk by March 4. Failure to do so, we advised, would subject the appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). RR Royal Ranch did not make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record by this deadline. By letter of April 7, we again ordered RR Royal Ranch to make payment arrangements for the clerk’s record by April 18, and advised RR Royal Ranch we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution if it failed to do so. To date, RR Royal Ranch has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to comply with requirements of the appellate rules and this Court’s order. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). Finally, the pending motion of counsel for RR Royal Ranch to withdraw is granted. Within five days of the date of this opinion, counsel shall comply with the requirements of Appellate Rule 6.5(c). TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c). James T. Campbell Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
