In Re Manuel Saldana, Relator Appeal from ... of ... County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-14-00449-CV IN RE MANUEL SALDANA, RELATOR ORIGINAL PROCEEDING January 9, 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. On December 30, 2014, relator Manuel Saldana filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks that we compel the Honorable Don D. Emerson, presiding judge of the 320th District Court of Potter County, to enter detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014); Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). Because the Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive Article 11.07 jurisdiction, an intermediate appellate court has no jurisdiction to rule on matters pertaining to a pending Article 11.07 application. In re Enriquez, No. 12-14-00292-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 13475, *3 (Tex. App.—Tyler Dec. 17, 2014, orig. proceeding), citing Padieu, 392 S.W.3d at 117-18. And, because relator requests that we compel an action by the trial court directly relating to its handling of the Article 11.07 application, we lack jurisdiction to effect the relief he requests.1 See In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) ("Should an applicant find it necessary to complain about an action or inaction of the convicting court, the applicant may seek mandamus relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals."). Therefore, we have no jurisdiction over relator's request for relief. See In re Smith, No. 14-14-00698-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10025, *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 4, 2014, orig. proceeding), citing McAfee, 53 S.W.3d at 718. Finding we have no jurisdiction over his request for relief, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of mandamus. James T. Campbell Justice 1 In his petition, relator tells us also that the Court of Criminal Appeals has already denied his application for writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014). Even if so, given the relief relator requests of us, we do not see that fact as authorizing us to exercise jurisdiction over his petition. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
