Anthony Pansza v. The State of Texas Appeal from 187th District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-14-00274-CR ANTHONY PANSZA, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 187th District Court Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR5757, Honorable Raymond Angelini, Presiding October 13, 2014 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant, Anthony Pansza, filed notice of appeal from a judgment adjudicating him guilty of the offense of murder,1 and sentence of forty years incarceration in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The appellate court clerk received and filed the trial court clerk s record on August 4, 2014. The official court reporter filed the reporter s record with the appellate court clerk on August 7. 1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. ยง 19.02 (West 2011). Consequently, appellant s brief was due to be filed on or before September 8, 2014.2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6. On September 16, this Court sent appellant notice that his brief was past due. In that letter, this Court informed appellant that, if he failed to file his brief by September 26, the appeal would be abated and the cause remanded to the trial court without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed his brief nor responded to our September 16 correspondence. Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The clerk s record reflects that the trial court has appointed Debra L. Parker to represent appellant on appeal. Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent; (3) whether present counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal; (4) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and is indigent, whether appellant=s present counsel should be replaced; and (5) what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant=s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal or, if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued. If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the trial court should cause the Clerk of this Court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-retained attorney. 2 Thirty days from the date that the clerk s record was filed would be September 6. However, September 6, 2014, was a Saturday. Thus, the deadline for filing appellant s brief would be extended to Monday, September 8, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a). 2 The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and file findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations addressing the determinations identified above and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk=s record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings to be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter=s record; (4) have a record of the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the supplemental clerk=s record or the supplemental reporter=s record; and (5) cause the records of the proceedings to be sent to this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). In the absence of a request for extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk=s record, supplemental reporter=s record, and any additional proceeding records, including any orders, findings, conclusions, and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be received by the Clerk of this Court not later than Wednesday, November 12, 2014. Per Curiam Do not publish. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
