Grady R. Mitchell v. Popat Patel, Individually, a/k/a Paul Patel, Kamu Patel, Individually, Sunil Patel, Individually and d/b/a Super 8 Motel and Anand, Inc.--Appeal from 237th District Court of Lubbock County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-12-0022-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 9, 2012 ___________________________ GRADY R. MITCHELL, Appellant v. POPAT PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY, A/K/A PAUL PATEL, KAMU PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY, SUNIL PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY, AND D/B/A SUPER 8 MOTEL, AND ANAND, INC., Appellees ___________________________ FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2009-547,914; HON. LES HATCH, PRESIDING __________________________ Order of Dismissal __________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Grady R. Mitchell filed a notice of appeal on January 20, 2012. We dismiss the appeal. The clerk s record was filed on March 16, 2012, a hearing record was filed on April 19, 2012, and a supplemental clerk s record was filed on April 26, 2012. No reporter s record was filed. Appellant s brief was due on June 15, 2012. No brief was filed by that date, so the Court notified appellant on June 18, 2012, that the due date for the brief had lapsed, that the brief had not been filed, and that if it was not received by June 28, 2012, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. To date, no brief or motion to extend the deadline has been filed. On June 15, 2012, appellant filed a letter stating that because of health issues and stress, he was unsure about continuing the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b). Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
