Dos Pansoncitos, Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hedrick v. William T. Sisco, M.D.--Appeal from 99th District Court of Lubbock County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-11-0108-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C OCTOBER 13, 2011 ______________________________ DOS PANSONCITOS, INC., JIM BULLARD AND JOHN HEDRICK, APPELLANTS V. WILLIAM T. SISCO, M.D., APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO.2009-548,044; HONORABLE WILLIAM SOWDER, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellee, William T. Sisco, M.D., filed suit against Appellants, Dos Pansoncitos, Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hendrick alleging numerous causes of action related to a written contractual agreement for the purchase of a note. Following a bench trial, the trial court ordered that Dr. Sisco recover $50,000 in damages plus attorney's fees. Appellants perfected this appeal. Pending before this Court is Appellants' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss in which they represent that there is no longer an issue in controversy as the parties have settled and compromised their differences. Appellants request that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice and that costs be incurred against the party incurring them. Without passing on the merits of the case, Appellants' motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Per the motion, costs are to be assessed against the party incurring them. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at Appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
