In Re Kenneth Hickman-Bey, Relator--Appeal from of County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-10-0224-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B AUGUST 5, 2010 ______________________________ In re: KENNETH HICKMAN-BEY, Relator _______________________________ On Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Pending before the court is the application of Kenneth Hickman-Bey, for a writ of mandamus. He asks us to order the Honorable Ron Enns, 69th District Court, to schedule a hearing and act upon various motions pending in a suit he initiated. The motions include Plaintiff s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff s Motion for Change of Venue. We dismiss the petition as moot. On June 22, 2010, we directed Judge Enns to respond to relator s petition for mandamus. On July 14, 2010, Judge Enns filed his response wherein he granted relator s motion for teleconferencing regarding his unresolved pleadings. A copy of the document evincing the action is attached to this opinion as Exhibit A. Accordingly, we do not reach the merits of the issues raised, and the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See In re Duncan, 62 S.W.3d 333, 334 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). This dismissal is without prejudice to the relator s right to seek a writ of mandamus should unreasonable delay arise in the scheduling of the teleconference and ruling upon the aforesaid motions and pleadings. Per Curiam 2 3 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
