Bio-D Products, Inc., Thomas Martin, Karen Martin, MXT, L.L.C. and Joe Markham v. Aquent, LLC--Appeal from 108th District Court of Potter County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-10-0056-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MARCH 30, 2010 ______________________________ JOE MARKHAM, APPELLANT VS. AQUENT, L.L.C., APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 97,206-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, JUDGE _______________________________ Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before this Court is Appellant's First Amended Motion to Dismiss for Mootness filed on behalf of Appellant, Joe Markham. By this motion Appellant contends that this accelerated appeal of the order denying his special appearance in the trial court below should be dismissed because Appellee, Aquent, L.L.C., has non-suited all claims against him in that proceeding. Without passing on the merits of the case, the motion is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Having dismissed the appeal at Appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Appellant requests this Court to grant him judgment for costs. Absent agreement of the parties, in dismissing an appeal, an appellate court must tax costs against the appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). Patrick A. Pirtle Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
