Charlotte Welch, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of L.V. Welch v. Pinnacle Technologies, Inc.--Appeal from 72nd District Court of Crosby County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-08-0161-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 27, 2008 ______________________________ CHARLOTTE WELCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF L.V. WELCH, APPELLANT V. PINNACLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 415TH DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY; NO. CV-05-1676; HONORABLE GRAHAM QUISENBERRY, JUDGE _______________________________ Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Charlotte Welch, perfected an appeal from the trial court s summary judgment. Welch has now filed a motion to dismiss her appeal and has conformed to the requirements of Rule 10.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. This disposition is authorized by Rule 42.1(a)(1) and 43.2(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Finding the motion complies with the requirements of Rules 10.1 and 42.1(a), we dismiss the appeal. Further, the court will tax costs against Welch. TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having disposed of this appeal at Welch s request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate shall issue forthwith. Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
