John O. Thornton, Jr. v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 140th District Court of Lubbock County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-07-0169-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 25, 2007 ______________________________ JOHN O. THORNTON, JR., APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2006-412884; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant John O. Thornton, Jr. filed a pro se notice of appeal from his conviction for murder and accompanying sentence of life in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The certification of right to appeal executed by the trial court, and signed by appellant's trial counsel, states that "the defendant has waived the right of appeal." By letter dated May 21, 2007, we notified appellant of this circumstance, and that the appeal is subject to dismissal based on the certification unless, by June 11, 2007, we were provided an amended certification illustrating that he has the right to appeal or appellant demonstrates other grounds for continuing the appeal. On June 12th, the trial court appointed appellate counsel to assist appellant in determining whether appellant had any rights of appeal. On June 12th, counsel requested an extension of time to review the record and this court granted that request. On July 5th, counsel notified this court that, upon review of the plea proceedings, this case was a negotiated plea bargain which appellant received a life sentence in accordance with the plea agreement. Further, the trial court did not give appellant the right to appeal any outstanding issue nor were there any pretrial motions previously ruled upon by the trial court. Accordingly, we must, and do, dismiss the appeal. TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); See also Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) (we must dismiss prohibited appeal without further action). Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not publish. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
