In the Matter of the Marriage of Bobby Smith and Janell Smith v. Wishbone Land & Cattle Co., Inc. and Triple S Trade Lot, Inc., and Monty Carol Smith, Individually, and Bobby Darrell Smith, Individually--Appeal from 286th District Court of Hockley County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-06-0130-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D NOVEMBER 21, 2006 ______________________________ JANELL SMITH, APPELLANT V. WISHBONE LAND & CATTLE CO., INC. AND TRIPLE S TRADE LOT, INC., AND MONTY CAROL SMITH AND BOBBY DARRELL SMITH, APPELLEES _________________________________ FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY; NO. 04-01-19445; HONORABLE HAROLD PHELAN, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION In a divorce proceeding between Bobby Smith and Janell Smith, Janell Smith filed a third party petition against Wishbone Land & Cattle Co. Inc., Triple S Trade Lot, Inc., Monty Carol Smith and Bobby Darrell Smith. Janell Smith filed a notice of appeal challenging dismissal of her petition against Wishbone Land & Cattle and Triple S Trade Lot. Her docketing statement listed only Monty Carol Smith and Bobby Darrell Smith as appellees. Monty Carol Smith and Bobby Darrell Smith also perfected appeal from the trial court s judgment. Their docketing statement listed Janell Smith and Bobby Smith as appellees. All these parties have joined in an agreed motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the appeals in accordance with Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). Finding the motion complies with the requirements of Rules 6.6 and 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled, we dismiss the appeals. Having disposed of the appeals at the parties express request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate will issue forthwith. James T. Campbell Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
