R. Wayne Johnson v. Mary Miller, et al--Appeal from of County

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 07-06-0374-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 26, 2006 ______________________________ R. WAYNE JOHNSON, APPELLANT V. MARY MILLER, ET AL., APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 320th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant R. Wayne Johnson, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on September 19, 2006 from the denial of permission to file suit, after having been found to be a vexatious litigant and prohibited from filing suit without permission. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 11.054, 11.101, 11.102 (Vernon 2002) (establishing procedure). On appeal, he did not pay the filing fee required under the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Nor did he file an affidavit of indigence in conformity with Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1. By letter from this Court dated September 27, 2006, we advised appellant that the filing fee in the amount of $125.00 has not been paid. Failure to pay the filing fee within ten (10) days from the date of this notice may result in a dismissal. TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Holt v. F. F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex.App. Amarillo 1998, pet. denied) (op. on rehearing). Appellant has not paid the fee as directed or filed an affidavit of indigence. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(c), 5. James T. Campbell Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.