Frankie Alvarez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 64th District Court of Swisher County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-06-0259-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JULY 26, 2006 ______________________________ FRANKIE ALVAREZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _________________________________ FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY; NO. A-3944-0504; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING _______________________________ Order of Dismissal _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant, Frankie Alvarez, appeals his conviction for deadly conduct. We dismiss the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. The record before us discloses that sentence was imposed upon appellant in open court on March 20, 2006. Thus, he had until April 19, 2006, to either file a notice of appeal or a motion for new trial and thereby extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal. See TEX . R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (discussing the deadlines by which one must perfect an appeal). The record discloses that his motion for new trial was filed on April 20, 2006, and notice of appeal on June 20, 2006. Given this, appellant s effort to perfect an appeal was untimely. Moreover, this circumstance was made known to appellant by letter from this court dated July 13, 2006. In that letter, appellant and his counsel were also given opportunity to respond. No response has been received to date. A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, then we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.1 Brian Quinn Chief Justice Do not publish. 1 Permission to perfect an untimely appeal may be sought through art. 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
