In Re Bobby W. Willard, Relator--Appeal from of County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-05-0256-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JULY 18, 2005 ______________________________ IN RE BOBBY W. WILLARD, RELATOR _______________________________ Before REAVIS, CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS By this original proceeding, relator Bobby W. Willard, acting pro se1 and in forma pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the 364th District Court of Lubbock County, to rule on motions for recusal, to compel disclosure of prior DNA autoradiograph results or sanction. We deny the petition. Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prescribes the mandatory contents for a petition for mandamus. Specifically, relator has failed to comply with subparagraphs (b), (c), (e), (f), (i) and (j) of Rule 52.3. Rule 52.7 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prescribes the record to be filed with the petition for mandamus. Specifically, relator has failed to comply with subparagraph (a)(1) of Rule 52.7. Thus, 1 A pro se litigant is held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with applicable laws and rules of procedure. Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756, 759 (Tex. App. Amarillo 1998, no pet.). because relator has not complied with the requirements of Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we deny the petition. Mackey K. Hancock Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
