Lucio Roman Carrasco v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 251st District Court of Potter County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-04-0052-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 18, 2004 ______________________________ LUCIO ROMAN CARRASCO, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 46,805-C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE _______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Lucio Roman Carrasco appeals a conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. BACKGROUND Appellant pled guilty to the charge of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Sentence was imposed on December 1, 2003. He did not file a motion for new trial. Notice of appeal was filed on February 6, 2004. LAW In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a notice of appeal. TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(b). The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order, unless a timely motion for new trial is filed. TRAP 26.2(a). The time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended for 15 days under certain circumstances. TRAP 26.3. If the time for filing a notice of appeal is to be extended, both a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time which complies with TRAP 10.5(b) must be filed within the 15 day period. TRAP 26.3; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523-25 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). An untimely-filed notice of appeal will not invoke the jurisdiction of the court of appeals. See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). Thus, if an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523-25. -2- ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Appellant s notice of appeal was not timely filed. A motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal was not filed. Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction over the appeal. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. TEX . R. APP. P. 39.8, 40.2, 43.2. Phil Johnson Chief Justice Do not publish. -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
