Zella Wade v. Deere Credit Services, Inc.--Appeal from 286th District Court of Hockley County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-04-0067-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E MARCH 23, 2004 ______________________________ ZELLA WADE, APPELLANT V. DEERE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY; NO. 01-09-18,552; HONORABLE HAROLD PHELAN, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Zella Wade filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court s judgment. Notwithstanding the trial court s announcement that it intended to grant a new trial, 1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. appellee Deere Credit Services, Inc. also filed a notice of appeal prior to the deadline out of an abundance of caution. Pending before this Court is Deere Credit s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal following the trial court s corrected order granting a new trial on liability and damage claims in Wade s breach of contract action. We grant the motion. The legal effect of an order granting a new trial vacates the original judgment and returns the case to the trial court as if no previous trial had been conducted. Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Scott, 846 S.W.3d 832, 833 (Tex. 1993); see also Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App. Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); Long John Silver s, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 773, 777 (Tex.App. San Antonio 1993, writ dism d w.o.j.). Thus, there is no final judgment from which an appeal may be prosecuted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Don H. Reavis Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
