Jose Santos Cervantes v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 64th District Court of Hale County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-03-0181-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JANUARY 29, 2004
______________________________
JOSE SANTOS CERVANTES, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;
NO. A14649-0209; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., JUDGE
_______________________________
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Following his conviction for theft, appellant Jose Santos Cervantes was placed on
community supervision for five years. Upon the State’s motion to revoke community
supervision for violations of the conditions thereof, the trial court (1) conducted a hearing
at which appellant plead true to the State’s allegations, (2) heard evidence, and (3) granted
the State’s motion. Appellant was sentenced to two years confinement in a state jail
facility. After appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief and a motion to withdraw indicating
there is no meritorious error to present on appeal, appellant filed a pro se motion to dismiss
his appeal.
By his pro se motion, appellant represents that he agrees with his counsel that this
appeal is frivolous and requests that it be dismissed. No decision of this Court having been
delivered to date, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.2(a). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is also granted. No motion for rehearing will be
entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Don H. Reavis
Justice
Do not publish.
1
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
