In the Interest of A.H. and B. H., Children Appeal from 360th District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00356-CV ___________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.H. AND B.H., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360-639731-18 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth MEMORANDUM OPINION In November 2021, the trial court entered an order terminating L.W.’s parental rights to two of her children, A.H. and B.H.1 We affirmed that termination order in In re A.H., No. 02-21-00402-CV, 2022 WL 1682422, at *1–11 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth May 26, 2022, no pet.) (mem. op.). After we handed down our opinion, T.W.—who was not a party to the termination proceedings in the trial court2— attempted to file this separate, second appeal from the termination order. “Generally, only parties of record may appeal a trial court’s judgment.” In re Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 184 S.W.3d 718, 723 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); H.M.W. v. Tex. Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., No. 03-20-00093-CV, 2020 WL 962388, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 28, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.); see Tex. R. App. P. 25.1, 26.1; State v. Naylor, 466 S.W.3d 783, 787–88 (Tex. 2015) (orig. proceeding) (explaining that appellate standing is generally limited to parties of record and stating that “an appeal filed by an improper party must be dismissed”). Accordingly, we notified T.W. of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal. We warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless, within ten days, T.W. filed a response showing grounds for continuing it. See Tex. R. To protect the identities of the children, we use aliases to refer to them and others associated with this case. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2). 1 The clerk’s record indicates that T.W. is the mother of L.W. and the maternal grandmother of A.H. and B.H. 2 2 App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. More than ten days have passed, but we have not received a response. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); H.M.W., 2020 WL 962388, at *1 (dismissing for want of jurisdiction when nonparty grandmother attempted to appeal from termination order). /s/ Bonnie Sudderth Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice Delivered: October 20, 2022 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
