Jeremy James Gillette v. The State of Texas Appeal from 235th District Court of Cooke County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00121-CR ___________________________ JEREMY JAMES GILLETTE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 235th District Court Cooke County, Texas Trial Court No. CR19-00911 Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Jeremy James Gillette attempts to appeal the trial court’s “Agreed Order Substituting Counsel.” On September 8, 2021, we notified Gillette of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over his appeal because the trial court has not entered any appealable orders. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per curiam) (holding that a court of appeals generally only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction). We informed Gillette that we could dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response by September 20, 2021, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3. Gillette has not filed a response. Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161. /s/ Dana Womack Dana Womack Justice Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) Delivered: October 14, 2021 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
