Lee Anthony Loggins v. The State of Texas Appeal from 362nd District Court of Denton County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00336-CR ___________________________ LEE ANTHONY LOGGINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 362nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. F-94-1011-D Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Lee Anthony Loggins was convicted on September 2, 1994, of sexual assault, burglary, and theft. He did not immediately appeal his convictions. In August 2019, Appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court. After considering the application, the trial court signed an order on September 9, 2019, recommending that the court of criminal appeals deny the application. On the same day that the trial court signed that order, Appellant filed a “Motion for Appeal” by mail with the Denton County District Clerk. Based on Appellant’s incarcerated status and the fact that he had filed his “Motion for Appeal” by mail and that it was received on the same day that the trial court’s habeas corpus order was signed, we interpreted Appellant’s “Motion for Appeal” as an attempt to file a direct appeal of his 1994 convictions.1 Out of concern that we might lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we notified Appellant by letter that his notice of appeal had been due October 3, 1994, and requested a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). We cautioned Appellant that his appeal could be dismissed for We note that even if we were to interpret Appellant’s “Motion for Appeal” as an attempt to appeal the trial court’s habeas corpus order, we do not have jurisdiction to consider such an appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07(c) (vesting the court of criminal appeals with exclusive appellate jurisdiction over applications for 11.07 writs of habeas corpus). 1 2 want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. We have received no response. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3. /s/ Bonnie Sudderth Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) Delivered: December 5, 2019 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
