Michael Oshea White v. The State of Texas Appeal from 396th District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00386-CR ___________________________ MICHAEL OSHEA WHITE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1451976R Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Oshea White, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s alleged denial of his “Motion for Court Records for [Habeas] Corpus Proceedings.”1 We sent White a letter expressing our concern that we do not have jurisdiction because the trial court has not entered any appealable orders. We informed him that unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we would dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Although we granted several extensions of time for White to respond to our letter, he did not. In a criminal appeal, we generally have jurisdiction only upon a final judgment of conviction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02; McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). The trial court has not signed a final judgment of conviction or another order from which White may appeal. We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161. /s/ Wade Birdwell Wade Birdwell Justice In this motion, White asked the trial court to permit him to review transcripts relating to a conviction from which he was seeking postconviction relief. In 2017, we affirmed White’s convictions for two counts of aggravated sexual assault and for one count of aggravated assault on a family member. White v. State, No. 02-16-00207-CR, 2017 WL 2289096, at *5 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 25, 2017, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We have not received an order denying White’s motion to review the transcripts. 1 2 Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) Delivered: February 14, 2019 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.