Tervon Lee Basped v. The State of Texas Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00365-CR No. 02-18-00366-CR No. 02-18-00367-CR No. 02-18-00368-CR No. 02-18-00369-CR No. 02-18-00370-CR ___________________________ TERVON LEE BASPED, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 1543524R, 1543534R, 1543538R, 1543547R, 1543549R, 1543550R Before Meier, Gabriel, and Kerr, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Tervon Lee Basped attempts to appeal his convictions for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Each trial court certification states that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On August 24, 2018, we notified Basped that we would dismiss these appeals unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing them. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. Basped responded that each cause involved an open plea, not a plea bargain, but that he may have waived his right to appeal. We disagree that these are not plea-bargain cases. The record shows that although Basped pleaded guilty to the aggravated robbery charges without an agreement on punishment, which is not typically the result of plea bargains, the State, in exchange for his guilty pleas, agreed to dismiss count 2 of each indictment and four other aggravated robbery charges. This type of bargain—a “charge bargain”—is a plea bargain: “An agreement to dismiss a pending charge . . . effectively puts a cap on punishment at the maximum sentence for the charge that is not dismissed.” Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); see Mays v. State, No. 02-07-00259-CR, 2008 WL 2930536, at *1 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth July 31, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (reasoning similarly); see also Kassube v. State, Nos. 12-08-00364-CR, 12-08-00365-CR, 2010 WL 697362, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.—Tyler Feb. 26, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“Both charge bargains and sentence bargains can result in 2 a ‘plea bargain case’ as defined by rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.”). There is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court gave Basped permission to appeal. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’s certifications, we dismiss these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 25.2(d), 43.2(f). Per Curiam Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) Delivered: October 25, 2018 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
