Alejandro Salazar v. The State of Texas Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 3 of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-18-00004-CR ALEJANDRO SALAZAR APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1313460D ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Alejandro Salazar has filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s order adjudicating him guilty of assault against a public servant and sentencing him to three years’ confinement. Pursuant to an agreement with the State, Salazar pleaded true to four allegations in the motion to adjudicate in exchange for the State’s three-year punishment recommendation. He signed written plea 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. admonishments that included a waiver of the right of appeal. The trial court’s certification of Salazar’s right to appeal has an “X” next to the “plea-bargain case” option and a checkmark next to the “has waived the right of appeal” option. Rule 25.2(a)(2) does not restrict the right of appeal when a defendant pleads true to one or more allegations in a petition to adjudicate. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a); Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 911–12 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). But if a defendant pleads true and signs a waiver of the right of appeal in exchange for the State’s punishment recommendation––and the trial court follows the recommendation––the waiver is binding. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d 239, 242–43 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2005, no pet.); cf. Ex parte Delaney, 207 S.W.3d 794, 797–98 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (explaining that when defendant waives right of appeal in exchange for recommended sentence that trial court subsequently follows, “any possible source of error” during sentencing is removed). Because Salazar waived his right to appeal the trial court’s order of adjudication, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Jackson, 168 S.W.3d at 243. PER CURIAM PANEL: BIRDWELL, J.; SUDDERTH, C.J.; and WALKER, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: March 15, 2018 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
