In re Arturo Solis Appeal from 30th District Court of Wichita County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00461-CV IN RE ARTURO SOLIS RELATOR ---------ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------The court has considered Relator Arturo Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against the Wichita County District Clerk, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. To the extent Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against the Twelfth Court of Appeals, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against Judge Bert Richardson, we deny Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against the judges of the 30th District Court, the 78th District Court, and the 89th District Court of Wichita County, we deny Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus. And to the extent that Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus seeks declaratory judgments from this court, we deny Solis’s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J. DELIVERED: December 15, 2016 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
