Robert Alvah Brimmer, II, M.D. v. Dana Butler, M.D.; Benjamin J. Leeah, M.D.; Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine Appeal from 30th District Court of Wichita County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00235-CV ROBERT ALVAH BRIMMER, II, M.D. APPELLANT V. DANA BUTLER, M.D.; BENJAMIN J. LEEAH, M.D.; TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE APPELLEES ------------ FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 183,563-A ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT -----------On August 9, 2016, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment. Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue. PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: August 30, 2016 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.