Patricia O'Linda Scott v. Serpro Logistics, Neuse Management, LLC US. 1391104, Miguel Angel Mairena, and Edwin Hernandez Appeal from 342nd District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00278-CV PATRICIA O’LINDA SCOTT APPELLANT V. SERPRO LOGISTICS, NEUSE MANAGEMENT, LLC US. 1391104, MIGUEL ANGEL MAIRENA, AND EDWIN HERNANDEZ APPELLEES ---------FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 342-277174-15 ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------On September 1, 2015, we notified Patricia O’Linda Scott (i) of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over her attempt to appeal an order granting summary judgment in favor of Serpro Logistics and Neuse Management Transport 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. because the order does not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order and (ii) that unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before September 11, 2015, showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 2 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. We have received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: October 8, 2015 2 The order neither disposes of all defendants nor states with unmistakable clarity that it is a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that a judgment is final for purposes of appeal if it (1) actually disposes of all claims and parties or (2) states with unmistakable clarity that it is a final judgment). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.