Karl Dean Jackson v. The State of Texas Appeal from 396th District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00513-CR NO. 02-14-00514-CR KARL DEAN JACKSON APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NOS. 1319320D, 1328761D ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------In August 2013, Appellant Karl Dean Jackson pleaded guilty to two second-degree felony offenses—indecency with a child and burglary of a habitation—in exchange for seven years’ deferred-adjudication community supervision for each offense. 30.02(c)(2) (West 2011). 1 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 21.11(d), In December 2014, after Jackson pleaded true to See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. several of the allegations in the State’s petition to proceed to adjudication, the trial court found those allegations, as well as other allegations, true. The trial court then revoked Jackson’s community supervision, convicted him of both offenses, and sentenced him to fifteen years’ confinement in each case, to be served concurrently. See id. § 12.33 (West 2011) (stating that the punishment range for a second-degree felony is not more than 20 years or less than 2 years and up to a $10,000 fine). In a single issue, Jackson complains that his sentences constituted excessive and disproportionate punishment. However, Jackson concedes in his brief that he did not raise this complaint in the trial court or in a subsequent motion for new trial, and he acknowledges that this court, in Laboriel-Guity v. State, 336 S.W.3d 754, 756 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref’d), and Kim v. State, 283 S.W.3d 473, 475 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. ref’d), “has consistently held that proportionality complaints are forfeited when there is no complaint during the trial or in a subsequent motion for new trial.” Declining Jackson’s invitation to reconsider Laboriel-Guity and Kim, we overrule his sole issue as unpreserved and affirm the trial court’s judgments. /s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and SUDDERTH, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) 2 DELIVERED: June 25, 2015 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
