Russell H. Sitton, Jr., Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Russell H. Sitton, Sr., Deceased v. Azle Manor Health Care & Rehabilitation, L.L.L.P. d/b/a Azle Manor Health Care & Rehabilitation Appeal from 141st District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00276-CV RUSSELL H. SITTON, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RUSSELL H. SITTON, SR., DECEASED APPELLANT V. AZLE MANOR HEALTH CARE & REHABILITATION, L.L.L.P. D/B/A AZLE MANOR HEALTH CARE & REHABILITATION APPELLEE ---------FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 141-268081-13 ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ---------- 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Appellant Russell H. Sitton, Jr., individually and on behalf of the estate of Russell H. Sitton, Sr., attempts to appeal from the trial court s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Azle Manor Health Care & Rehabilitation, L.L.L.P. d/b/a Azle Manor Health Care & Rehabilitation. Other defendants remain in the case pending in the trial court. Accordingly, on September 3, 2014, this court notified Appellant of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order does not appear to be final or an appealable interlocutory order. We informed Appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless Appellant or any party filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have received no response. Accordingly, because an interlocutory summary judgment is not appealable, and the trial court has not yet disposed of the remaining parties, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 2 PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DELIVERED: October 16, 2014 2 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (West Supp. 2014) (listing types of appealable interlocutory orders); Lehmann v. Har Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (stating that generally an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment and that a judgment is final and appealable if it disposes of all parties and all issues); see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.