In re Erick AndikaAppeal from 78th District Court of Wichita County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00391-CV IN RE ERICK ANDIKA RELATOR -----------ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 -----------The court has considered relator s Petition For Writ of Mandamus to Correct an Illegal Sentence and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2 Accordingly, relator s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and MCCOY, JJ. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 Our denial of mandamus relief does not preclude relator from seeking relief on his claim of an illegal sentence through a properly-raised article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2013); see also Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ( We have long held that a claim of an illegal sentence is cognizable on a writ of habeas corpus. ). DELIVERED: November 12, 2013 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.