Robert Hasty v. The State of TexasAppeal from 158th District Court of Denton County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00385-CR NO. 02-13-00386-CR NO. 02-13-00387-CR NO. 02-13-00388-CR NO. 02-13-00389-CR ROBERT HASTY APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Appellant Robert Hasty filed a notice of appeal for each of these cases, attempting to appeal his 2005 conviction for burglary of a building and his 2009 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. convictions for burglary of a building, engaging in organized criminal activity, and two counts of theft. On August 21, 2013, we notified Hasty that these appeals may be dismissed based on the trial court s certifications, each of which state that the case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal and that the defendant has waived the right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). We also notified Hasty of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeals because of the untimely-filed notices of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). We requested that he or any party desiring to continue the appeals file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals by September 3, 2013, or the appeals could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 42.3(a), 43.2(f). Hasty filed a response requesting dismissal of the appeals.2 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 2 Specifically, Hasty states, This letter is in regards to a letter I received from the appeal court August 21, 2013 stating that I was challenging my conviction that I received on Sept. 11, 2009. I understand it was a plea bargain. So please dismiss the notice of appeal on the above convictions on plea bargaining my case. 2 PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: September 26, 2013 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.