Natasha Ramsey v. Sunset Mortgage, its Assigns and/or Successors in Interest, its affiants' and U.S. Persons of interest, JP Court No. 1, County Court at Law No.1 Tarrant County Constables Pct 7Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00206-CV NATASHA RAMSEY APPELLANT V. SUNSET MORTGAGE, ITS ASSIGNS AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, ITS AFFIANTS' AND U.S. PERSONS OF INTEREST, JP COURT NO. 1, COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.1 TARRANT COUNTY CONSTABLES PCT 7 APPELLEES ------------ FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT -----------On August 13, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk s record and provided this court with proof of payment. Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue. PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. DELIVERED: August 29, 2013 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.