Efrain Carrillo Garcia a/k/a Garcia Efrain v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 372nd District Court of Tarrant County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00336-CR David Lee Hayman of Wichita County (45,968-A) § December 21, 2012 § The State of Texas From the 30th District Court § v. § Per Curiam § (nfp) JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS PER CURIAM COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00536-CR EFRAIN CARRILLO GARCIA A/K/A GARCIA EFRAIN APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Appellant Efrain Carrillo Garcia a/k/a Garcia Efrain attempts to appeal from his conviction for the sexual assault of a child. § 22.011(a)(2) (West 2011). See Tex. Penal Code Ann. The trial court s certification of Garcia s right to appeal states that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 appeal and that the defendant has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On November 14, 2012, we notified Garcia s retained trial counsel of Garcia s pro se notice of appeal, that the certification indicating that Garcia had no right to appeal had been filed in this court, and that this appeal could be dismissed unless Garcia or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 26, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). To date, we have received no response showing any grounds for continuing the appeal. Rule 25.2(a)(2) limits the right of appeal in a plea bargain case to matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or to cases in which the appellant obtained the trial court s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). In the present case, the trial court s certification states that Garcia has no right to appeal and that he has waived his right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f). PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: December 21, 2012 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
