In re Eric Randall Hinkle--Appeal from 372nd District Court of Tarrant County (per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00327-CV IN RE ERIC RANDALL HINKLE RELATOR ------------ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 -----------The court has considered relator s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (holding that the court of criminal appeals is the only court with jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings ); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.) ( [W]hile the courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony Accordingly, relator s petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and WALKER, JJ. DELIVERED: August 13, 2012 2 proceedings. ).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.