Jonathan Eugene Patrick v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 3 of Tarrant County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00311-CR JONATHAN EUGENE PATRICK APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Pursuant to a plea bargain, Jonathan Eugene Patrick pled guilty to possession of one or more but less than four grams of methamphetamine. The trial court s certification of appellant s right to appeal states that this is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. On July 20, 2012, we sent the parties a letter notifying them that the appeal could be dismissed unless any party filed a response showing grounds for 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f). We have not received a response. Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that a plea-bargaining defendant may appeal only matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Because the trial court s certification shows that neither of these exceptions is applicable, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3; Chavez, 183 S.W.3d at 680. PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: September 27, 2012 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
